Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368-1644)

Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368 – 1644), David Robinson, editor,  Harvard University Press, 2008.

CourtCulture

Not only was the Ming Court Culture Conference the first event the Geiss Foundation sponsored, but also it was the first subvention the Foundation provided for a major publication in Ming studies.

This collection of essays shows the Ming court as an arena of competition and negotiation, where a large cast of actors pursued individual and corporate ends, personal agency shaped protocol and style, and diverse people, goods, and tastes converged. Rather than observing an immutable set of traditions, court culture underwent frequent reinterpretation and re-articulation, processes driven by immediate personal imperatives, mediated through social, political, and cultural interaction.

 The essays address several common themes. First, they rethink previous notions of imperial isolation, instead stressing the court’s myriad ties both to local Beijing society and to the empire as a whole. Second, the court was far from monolithic or static. Palace women, monks, craftsmen, educators, moralists, warriors, eunuchs, foreign envoys, and others strove to advance their interests and forge advantageous relations with the emperor and one another. Finally, these case studies illustrate the importance of individual agency. The founder’s legacy may have formed the warp of court practices and tastes, but the weft varied considerably. Reflecting the complexity of the court, the essays represent a variety of perspectives and disciplines—from intellectual, cultural, military, and political to art history and musicology.   (from Harvard University Press website).

The common perception is that during imperial China absolute court values ruled, but this collection of essays demonstrate that the Ming court was a complex hive in which diverse people, goals, values, tastes and goods circulated and jockeyed for acceptance.  Court culture, in fact, was a frequent waxing and waning of different perspectives and personalities.